Skip to main content

Anatomy of a gossip

Gossip - a: rumor or report of an intimate nature b: a chatty talk c: the subject matter of gossip..

Gossip is the Devil's radio. -- George Harrison


Most of those who say they don't like to gossip are lying. They probably fear to be a subject of gossip themselves. I would like to ascribe goss as the unit of gossip. Now how to define one goss? Well, say, you are watching a gossip show on TV, or reading a magazine, a goss would be defined as the number of people you can get engrossed in a conversation about the topic.  Pretty subjective and crude definition, but that's the best I could come up with.  We will talk more about it towards the end of this post.


There have been Hollywood movies about gossip.  It lies at the very core of the social human being.  It's a study area in psychology.  Studies have found that Gossip isn't just loose talk.  There are virtues and immoralities associated with it.  There's a social stigma and there are social groups tied to it.  In essence, love it or hate it, gossip is here to stay, as it has since the dawn of the Gossip GeneTM. 

Anatomically, gossip consists of a subject or topic and the people preying on it.  Gossiping supposedly releases dopamine in brain, causing reduction in stress and bolstering a feeling of belonging.  In other words, a group of people engrossed in a gossip are likely to be happy and feeling friendly towards each other.  (Can we get India and Pakistan to gossip?!!)  But it's darker side is grotesque.  There's no mercy shown upon the subject, living or dead.  Workplace gossips are perhaps only second worst to household gossip.  Paparazzi build their careers around this native human emotion.

Every workplace has one typical Dilbert's Boss.  His or her subordinates dislike him (Euphemism intended).  In a case, there's one, who's strong on words but lame on actions.  He's not respected, but damn does he give.  I like such people, they care like the passing wind.  So naturally everyone gossips about him/her, as they can't confront him/her.  He/She takes the credit for the work of his/her subordinates, and what do They do?!  Go to the secret underground and gossip!  It releases the frustration.  It's a kind of a punching bag to vent that fury.  There's unity in the group bitching about the boss.  There's a feeling of mutual brotherhood.  I wonder if this is one of the driving forces of Lamarckian Evolution.  If it is, the social fabric and even our existence depends on this factor.  Yes, I am suggesting that gossip is probably as important as social bonding in an evolutionary sense.

Talking about celebrity and political gossip; People spend countless evenings at tea stalls, barber shops etc. discussing the Indian polity.  It's virtually a parliament there.  "We need dictatorship in India" is the most frequent political comment I have heard in such gatherings.  It's funny, lively and sometimes enlightening.  We Indians love movies but hate the guts of actors because they are filthy rich.  Same with cricketers, with the exception of the God, Sachin Tendulkar; He can do no wrong!  

In retrospect of this post, I would assign household gossip around 8 goss, workplace gossip around 4 goss (owing to its risky nature) and political and celebrity gossip greater than 15 goss.  Yes, it's the most satisfying and openly gossiped subject. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sad Facts of Life

Some physicists call philosophy a vestigial part of Science, but it has its own uses.  Philosophy deals with the aspects of human mind (of many things) that are not mathematically quantifiable (yet).  But philosophy has served its purpose well, for the human mind is neither unbiased nor logical.  Evolutionarily, being strictly logical & fair have no distinctive advantages.  Human mind is also very feeble and any uncertainty and discomfort throws it off-course.

One such facet to the feeble mind is denial.  Mind has its coping mechanism to deal with things it cannot change and cannot accept.  But facts, as it is their nature, don't give a damn.  It got me thinking of some realities that I don't like accepting or I have witnessed people doing so, but are true.

These are some things that occurred to me.  The list is not exhaustive and is very subjective.

1.  Irregardless is not a real word.  It came into mainstream simply due to overuse.  In fact, the whole English language i…

General AI, Singularity and Elon Musk's fears surrounding it

Elon Musk has been raising concerns around the exponential advent of AI in the past decade, and  boy has it been exponential!  Many companies now have a CAiO (Chief AI Officer) to bridge the gap between the front runners in AI (Google, Microsoft, OpenAI etc.) and themselves.  Many academics don't share Elon's concerns, and even ridicule him for his alarmist views.  The argument the academics provide is that the current stage of AI is a nascent one, and the best General AI is still dumber than a toddler.  They also claim that AI has been useful only in a specialized domains, like Self-Driving cars, playing chess and Go, analyzing heaps of unstructured data and getting insights etc.  So although AI is super useful in a narrow range, something that can drive a car 100 times better than humans is unlikely to produce a piece of Art.  This is correct, looking at the existing AI landscape.  But the academics are missing the far term view, on a range of 200+ years into future.
With A…

International Anthem

Humanity is way better off right now than any other point in history.  Human suffering is at its lowest, economic growth is at all time best, technology is growing at the fastest rate ever, medical tech has more than doubled the average human lifespan in under 150 years; so on and so forth.

Of course not everything is merry, the Earth as a planet is suffering from our activities, moreover there are still wars, famines, dictators and genocides.  There's still a looming threat of nuclear annihilation and the guardians of The Bombs are crazy egomaniacs.

Interestingly, the concept of 'Country' seems to keep people from killing those within it en masse.  The criteria for me loving another person as a fellow 'Countryman' is quite quaint as well; he or she just has to be born in the same enclosed geographical area as me!  I automatically will be somehow related to that person under the flag of my country.  This sometimes results in Nationalism, which has worked quite wel…